« Wikisource:Scriptorium/Juillet 2018 » : différence entre les versions
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
Ligne 81 :
::{{Ping|Wuyouyuan}} So (in your opinion) there is no need to delete the above-mentioned book here and the version moved to multilingual Wikisource can be deleted? Definitely, there is no point to proofread the book in both sites. Pinging also {{Ping|Jusjih}} who imported the book there. [[Utilisateur:Ankry|Ankry]] ([[Discussion utilisateur:Ankry|d]]) 16 juillet 2018 à 09:48 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Ankry}}, {{Ping|Jusjih}}. To have a version of a litigious book in oldwikisource (USA OK) is good, in case some fr.wikisource zealot want to make his point. Give priority to the books "red" in the list [[Wikisource:Demande des éditions Gallimard du 15 février 2010]], asking for a temporary reactivation to make the move. I like especially Paul Eluard and Victor Segalen (Steles) , and [https://fr.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Auteur:Paul_Claudel&oldid=2672205 Paul Claudel] before 1923. --[[Utilisateur:Wuyouyuan|Wuyouyuan]] ([[Discussion utilisateur:Wuyouyuan|d]]) 16 juillet 2018 à 16:10 (UTC)
::::{{Ping|Wuyouyuan}} I mean it is bad to have it in both places: some people may proofread/validate here, some others there and nobody will be able to synchronize the changes. Fully support moving deleted books to oldwikisource. It would be nice if an admin of both sites could do this. [[Utilisateur:Ankry|Ankry]] ([[Discussion utilisateur:Ankry|d]]) 16 juillet 2018 à 20:19 (UTC)
== Réaction curieuse du modèle Bloc dans l'éditeur de page. ==
| |||