Le texte de cette page a été corrigé et est conforme au fac-similé.
pour la commodité[1]. » — « Si nous avions une mémoire assez ample et la faculté de maintenir l’ordre dans une grosse masse de détails, nous pourrions raisonner sans employer une seule proposition générale[2]. » Ici, comme
- ↑ All inference is from particulars to particulars : General propositions are merely registers of such inferences already made, and short formulae for making more : The major premiss of a syllogism, consequently, is a formula of this description : and the conclusion is not an inference drawn from the formula, but an inference drawn according to the formula : the real logical antecedent, or premisses, being the particular facts from which the general proposition was collected by induction. Those facts, and the individual instances which supplied them, may have been forgotten ; but a record remains, not indeed descriptive of the facts themselves, but showing how those cases may be distinguished respecting which the facts, when known, were considered to warrant a given inference. According to the indications of this record we draw our conclusion, which is, to ail intents and purposes, a conclusion from the forgotten facts. For this it is essential that we should read the record correctly : and the rules of the syllogism are a set of precautions to ensure our doing so.
- ↑ If we had sufficiently capacious memories, and a sufficient power of maintaining order among a huge masse of
